GLUYAS
WILLIAMS
Master
of Line and Shape and Subject
HIS
DRAWINGS had a pristine purity that gave them a distinction no other cartoonist
was able (or willing) to achieve. His line, seemingly fragile in contrast to
strategically placed solid flat blacks, was sturdy and not at all delicate: of
rigid unvarying width, it faithfully, dutifully, outlined his subjects without
affectation or folderol—no wrinkles in clothing, no shading, no shadows. Pure
and simple as his attitude towards his subjects, it was a wholly workmanlike
line, as workmanlike as the people he studied and understood and drew.
Rick
Marschall interviewed him in 1975 and published the result eight years later in Nemo: The Classic Comics Library No. 3, prefacing the exchange with a
flood of appreciative and accurate assessment (in italics):
Gluyas
Williams did more with less than practically any cartoonist in history. His
masterful panel drawings are genre studies, more often than not crowded with
figures, and frequently confusion is the mood. No: confusion is the subject;
urbanity is the mood. ...
All
of Williams’ characters somewhat nervously floated through the twentieth
century, slightly intimidated by technology and more than a little suspicious
of the traps and trappings of modern life that awaited, ready to attack, around
every corner.
Perfect
were his evocations of personality types and the upper-middle-class milieux
that he delineated. But Gluyas Williams’s most stunning accomplishments were as
a draftsman. Here was an artist in total command of his media—every pen line is
in place, nothing superfluous, yet everything so marvelously expressive.
Here
is the doing-more-with-less ideal, aspired to by many cartoonists, in its
finest incarnation. ... The stark economy in a Williams cartoon came nowhere
close to sterility: rather the scenes were vibrant and bursting with
personality. Every figure is doing something—and doing something so
expressively that you feel a part of the scene. Added to these gifts were
Williams’ awesome sense of design, perspective, and composition.
Gluyas
(pronounced GLUE-yass) Williams (23 July 1888-13 February 1982) was born in San
Francisco, California, the son of Robert Neil Williams and Virginia Gluyas. His
early education took place in Germany, France, and Switzerland. He attended Harvard
University, where he served as art editor of the Harvard Lampoon, the
campus humor magazine of legend.
In
1911, after only three years, Williams graduated with a B.A. and went to Paris
for six months to study life drawing in the studio of Angelo Colarossi, a
celebrated model. Williams didn’t plan on becoming a painter, but he realized,
as he later told Marschall, “I just had an idea that it would do me good—and I
think it did, too. I mean, you learn how the body is put together, and just
draw and draw and draw all day.”
Upon
his return to the United States, he followed the example of his older sister,
Kate Carew (her married name), who was, by then, a success drawing for
newspapers.
Said
Williams: “They had newspaper trucks that went around town delivering
newspapers to newsstands, and they all had billboard-like signs on the
sides—‘See Kate Carew, the only woman caricaturist’ or something like that.
They sent her everywhere—sent her over to Europe to come back with Teddy
Roosevelt on the boat when he returned from his hunting trip (in about 1910).”
She
was sent to London which is where she was when the War broke out. “It was then
that she did a great many theater things—caricatures—for The Tattler,
for The Sketch. She was good!”
Williams
did a daily comic strip for the Boston Journal, which he later disavowed
because it was “terrible.”
“You
have no idea how bad it was,” he told Marschall. “I worked at it for one full
summer and then I said, ‘This is not for me!’—and vice versa. And I got a job
on The Youth’s Companion.”
He
was soon the head of the magazine’s art department, and he stayed there for the
next ten years.
While
there, he also freelanced cartoons to various publications. His first
significant sale was to Frank Casey, art editor at Collier’s. Casey
bought and published as a cover a Williams drawing that had been rejected by
the weekly humor magazines Life and Puck. And with that, he began
selling his cartoons regularly to Collier’s, and when Charles Dana
Gibson bought the old Life humor magazine in 1918 and hired Casey as
art director, Williams became a steady contributor to Life.
Williams
married Margaret Kempton in 1915, and by 1920 he felt secure enough as a
cartoonist to give up his salaried position with Youth's Companion in
favor of a full-time freelance career. In addition to cartooning for magazines,
he wrote and illustrated a political spoof about "Senator Sounder"
for Life and he did theatrical caricatures for the fondly recalled Boston
Evening Transcript. These efforts brought him to the attention of William
Randolph Hearst, for whom he worked briefly, traveling to Washington, D.C., to
do political caricatures.
In
1922, he also illustrated Of All Things, first of the book collection of
Robert Benchley's humorous essays.
WILLIAMS
HAD MET BENCHLEY at the storied Harvard Lampoon. Williams was art
editor, and Benchley was an aspiring cartoonist. His first drawing printed in
the Lampoon showed two Irish women standing next to a smelly garbage
can. One says, “Ain’t it offal, Mable?” It was a standard bad pun joke of the
day.
In
her biography, Robert Benchley: His Life and Good Times, Babette Rosmond
says all of Benchley’s cartoon characters looked Irish. No doubt he was
partaking of an established cartooning custom: most highly comical characters
of the time were either Irish (and looked like monkeys) or African American
(with big lips and bugging eyes).
According
to the popularly circulated report (by Benchley), Williams pretty soon took
Benchley aside and said, “Now look, Benchley—you’ve written some things and
they aren’t bad, but your drawings aren’t very good. Why don’t you just stick
to writing? We have plenty of pictures.”
Reportedly,
Benchley, in rehearsing this tale, would complain that he could’ve been making
ten thousand dollars a week if he’d just stuck to drawing.
But
Williams disputed the story in his interview with Marschall: “Of course, he
just made that up: I don’t think I ever said any such thing at all.”
In
other tellings of the story, Benchley maintained that Williams’ advice at the Lampoon had effectively set his feet on his career path. Said Rosmond: “Robert was
overjoyed and rather staggered when he was elected president of the Lampoon—the
grandeur of the office scared him. He wondered if he would be equal to it; but
he needn’t have worried. His performance on the job founded a Benchley
tradition: both Robert Benchley’s sons, Nathaniel and Robert, Jr., were
presidents of the Lampoon in their respective years at Harvard.”
Among
the people who Benchley (and, presumably, Williams) knew in those Harvard days,
Rosmand reports, “were Frederick Lewis Allen, who would be come Harper’s editor-in-chief; and John Reed, later famous as author of the chronicle of the
Russian Revolution, Ten Days That Shook the World, who has the dubious
distinction of being the only American to be buried in Moscow’s Red Square.
“Reed,”
Rosmond continues, “was another person who recommended that Benchley pursue a
career in writing, sending him a letter inviting him to join Reed at his house
at 42 Washington Square in the Village. Said Reed: ‘I will guarantee that you
get a good room and fair treatment; the water pipes burst about once a month,
and the gaslight is not what it should be, but who cares? BOHEMIA! O BOHEMIA!’
Williams’
first Benchley book was followed by another in each of the next two years and
nine more over the next two decades. Williams illustrated them all. And in
return, Benchley wrote the Preface to the first book of Williams’ cartoons, The
Gluyas Williams Book, published in 1929. The two creators would be forever
linked.
Williams's
drawings of Benchley and his milieu so perfectly caught the mood of "the
little man" encountering the humiliations and frustrations of life in the
twentieth century that the cartoonist's work was often acclaimed as the best
part of the books. In this collaboration, Williams found his metier, a subject
and a treatment that were exactly attuned to his sensibility.
In
his customary role as the put-upon “little man,” Benchley elaborated upon his
relationship to Williams in the aforementioned Preface to The Gluyas
Williams Book (quoted here at length and in italics):
There
is only one drawback I having been Mr. Williams’ model for so many pictures.
After years of capturing those particular facial characteristics of which my
mother is so fond, he has quite unconsciously taken to putting me into all his drawings, commercial and otherwise, as the typical American Sap. ... My
friends point out to me that I have been caught to the life in a Williams
drawing showing the delight with which dear old Uncle Tasker will receive a
dressing gown for Christmas. When people come to me and say: “I saw your
picture in Vanity
Fair today,” I know instinctively that it was not among those nominated for
the Hall of Fame but in the back of the book among the advertisements typifying
the sort of men to whom a Bates umbrella or a pair of Goodyear rubbers will be
an ornament.
Not
only in his advertising drawings but in those amazing full pages in The New Yorker and Cosmopolitan where the face of Mr. Mencken’s Boobus Americanus is called for, mine is the
face.
Thus,
through his conscientious attempt to illustrate my books faithfully, Mr. Williams
has made me his lay figure, and owing to the enormous popularity of his
drawings, I am fast losing all personal identity and becoming a type, like the
Gibson Girl.
However,
if this is to be my path to fame, I am content. There could be no surer or more
permanent way of going down to posterity. For while there are other artists who
have caught something of the American scene, and other artists who can draw
well, I know of no other artist who combines, as Williams does, that sure
insight into the common mind and a technique which might well be turned to more
important things—if there were things more important. I believe that
Williams drawings will be preserved for expert contemplations both as data on
the manners and customs of our day and as graceful and important examples of
its art.
On
another occasion (in the Introduction to Fellow Citizens), Benchley
waxed more favorably yet (in italics):
I
have sometimes felt that Gluyas was a little overconscientious in delineating
my extra poundage in each book, but my friends tell me that, if anything, he
has been kind. All in all, it has been a beautiful relationship.
One
of the remarkable things about Gluyas Williams’ work is that he not only keeps
it funny but, through the exercise of some sort of necromancy, he has managed
to keep drawing as well as he did twenty years ago.
I
see him only about once a year, when he comes to New York to check up on my
waistline for the next book, but on those occasions, his usually placid face
becomes livid as he recounts his most recent escape from lynching at the hands
of his compatriots.
In American Heritage for December 1984, cartoonist Edward Sorel describes
the annual dinners (in italics):
Although
Williams lived in Newton (a suburb of Boston) and Benchley in Manhattan (a
suburb of the Algonquin [a celebrated hotel ands watering hole for New York
wits]), both made it a practice to meet at least once a year in New York. Over
cocktails and dinner Williams would get caught up on all the gossip that never
reached Newton.
Williams
would later recall those dinners with his old friend: “He was a wonderful man,
probably the wittiest man in New York in his day, but he never hogged the
limelight. If you were with him he had the rare gift of making you feel that
you were the one who was saying the witty things.”
But
Williams must have been pretty good company himself. Charles Dana Gibson,
Harold Ross, Edward Streeter, and Alexander Woollcott were not the sort who
suffered fools gladly, and all valued his friendship. He seems to have had
enough good qualities to fill a Boy Scout manual. He was loyal: he stuck with
Gibson in 1929 when Gibson’s old Life was failing and other contributors had switched
to The New Yorker. And he was modest.
When
the publication date of his tenth book approached in 1938, Benchley had become
increasingly dissatisfied with his printed humor pieces. By then, he was making
a living as a theater critic and doing short humorous films. “I wish they would
never get it out,” he said about the forthcoming tome. “I haven’t seen Gluyas’s
drawings yet, but they have got to carry it, I’m afraid.”
By
then, Williams was well into his major contribution to American cartooning. In
1924 Williams sold a single-panel daily gag cartoon series to Bell Syndicate,
which distributed the feature nationwide for twenty-five years.
THE
TITLE OF THE FEATURE varied with the subject, as was the practice then in
similar endeavors by by J. R. Williams and Clare Briggs and
others. Whether called "Suburban Heights," "The World at Its Worst,"
"The Moment That Seems a Year," "Difficult Decisions,"
"The Neighborhood League," or any of a half-dozen other names, the
cartoon focused on the minor crises and tepid tribulations of middle-class life
in the suburbs of an America that was becoming increasingly urban. The cast was
composed of mostly anonymous businessmen, housewives, and youngsters, but a
comfortably portly fellow named Fred Perley was frequently the springboard to
the day's chuckle.
Williams
explained his philosophy for the feature: "Two things I strive for in my
cartoons: to bring the reader to smile at himself in the past or to make it
easier for him when the incident happens in the future."
As
a rule, Sorel said, “Williams drew only those things that he had observed
personally. Years after he retired [in 1953], he described his working methods
this way: ‘I’d watch for things to happen at the West Newton Station in the
morning or evening—things like somebody trying to get through the station door
to buy a paper, just as everyone else surges out to board the train; or trying
to get a taxi at the station on a rainy night; or the way everyone in the
station starts for the platform when a train rumbles by, and it’s usually a
freight train. All those little everyday occurrences can be built into
cartoons.’”
Said
Edward Street (whose Father of the Bride Williams illustrated) in The
Gluyas Williams Gallery (in italics):
Gluyas
Williams’ humor is a compound of gaiety and sadness, gallantry and failure,
pompousness and frustration, mixed in accordance with some secret formula that
he alone possesses and seasoned with a dash of futility and a pinch of
wistfulness. He sees humans as confused, insecure, well-intentioned duffers
bluffing their way through the world of half-baked customs and screwball mores
which they do not understand but cannot sidestep. You like his people and you
sympathize with them for the good reason that they are always you—just as they
are always Gluyas Williams.
...
with a few sparse strokes of his drawing pen he manages to convey the idea that
his subjects are not only making fools of themselves, but are quite aware of
it. One senses that, in spite of their embarrassment at being discovered, they will
do nothing to correct the situation. They are caught in strong currents and
find it easier to turn on their backs and float than to struggle against them.
In
the same book, humor writer David McCord goes to greater length (in italics):
This
universal human quality—a love, not a contempt, for his fellow man—is what sets
Gluyas Williams in a class by himself. Satire has no place in his method of
characterization. Even his painfully correct reporting of some of America’s
incredible playgrounds shows not the slightest trace of mockery. That crowds of
men and women can look and act as they do, and affect to find pleasure and
recreation in the sordid mass, is part of the subdivine comedy in which he
enters as a spectator, never as a critic. ...
Every
figure in a Williams drawing is doing something of value to the picture; every
niche and quarter of the background is justified and correct. The illusion of
distance, rain, and atmosphere, and of the unexplained, is effected solely by
‘the lucid, faultless line we have come so to admire.’
In
addition to his syndicated cartoons (which reportedly ran in about 70
newspapers, a goodly number in those days), Williams produced illustrations for
numerous books and advertisements.
Williams
was soon also a regular contributor to The New Yorker, which had been
launched by Harold Ross in February 1925. Although Ross began soliciting
cartoons from Williams almost at once, the cartoonist did not produce anything
for the magazine until 1926.
“Ross
would write,” Williams told Marschall, “but I’d say that I was based in Boston
and I didn’t know enough about New York to be of any use. And then he finally
sent me a cartoon idea about the house wrecker who has the wrong address.
“I
did it and sent it over, and Ross sent it back and said that it won’t do: he
said to get more fun into it—have a woman taking a bath while they’re taking
the bathtub out and like that. [Cartoons with women in bathtubs were standard
fare in the Ballyhoo magazine comedy of the period, but I doubt Ross
thought along those lines. He did, however, make suggestions that Williams
couldn’t accept, whatever they were.—RCH]
“Ross
said to change it and put those things in it, and he’d buy it. I sent it back
just as it was and said, ‘No, I wouldn’t touch it because my idea of humor was
understatement rather than slapstick.’ And Ross wrote—oh, how I wish I’d kept
that letter!—it was a wonderful letter, saying, ‘You’re perfectly right. I’m
going to change all my ideas on drawings. Of course that’s much subtler your
way and better.’
“And
after that letter,” Williams concluded, “I thought to myself that this was an
editor I’d like to work for.”
FOR
MOST OF HIS CAREER, Williams lived in West Newton, a suburb near Boston, but he
did his work at a studio in the city at 192 Boylston Street, to which he
commuted, completing his weekly quota of cartoons in four mornings. He took his
syndicated assignment seriously, said Sorel: “He made certain that he was always
fifty or sixty drawings ahead, just in case he got hit by a truck.
“He
was also cautious,” Sorel went on. “Fearing that the ramshackle building he
used for a studio would catch fire, he kept his reserve pile of drawings in the
local bank. Each week he would take out a week’s supply and send them to the
syndicate. But in 1933 Roosevelt declared a bank holiday. ‘My deadline was at
hand, and I couldn’t get to my drawings,’ Williams later re-called. ‘The
Boston Globe had to pull strings and arranged for me to go under guard to
my bank to get the drawings. The guard was supposed to make certain I didn’t
take any gold out.’”
Added
Sorel: “The bank-holiday story was one Williams told over and over. It was an
incident that must have seemed like high adventure in a life that was otherwise
prosaic: marriage, children, a home in the suburbs, a summer place in Maine,
grandchildren, and retirement at the age of sixty-five. He is quoted as saying:
‘I was sixty-five. It seemed like a great age to retire, so I did.’ But some
friends believe he was afraid that further drawing would cost him his sight.”
He
had almost three decades yet to live after he retired.
At
one o'clock every day, having finished his self-imposed quota for the day,
Williams left his studio in Boston and returned to life in suburbia, pursuing
such activities as cabinet-making, sailing, billiards, reading detective
stories, and playing bridge. The father of a son and daughter, Williams
exemplified in many respects the kind of life his cartoons depicted.
For The New Yorker, Williams produced the full-page cartoons under a series
of titles that typified his approach. Under the heading "Industrial
Crises," for example, the cartoonist depicted the panic and dismay among
company officials "the day a cake of Ivory sank at Procter &
Gamble's" and the chagrin and consternation that prevailed around the
boardroom table when "a director of the Diamond Match Company
absent-mindedly lights his cigar with an automatic lighter."
Typically,
a Williams cartoon was crowded with people, each a distinct individual doing
something appropriate for the scene. In "Office Building Lobby,"
Williams showed a throng of businessmen rushing to enter or leave, one looking
at his watch, another asking the elevator operator a question, yet another
consulting the building directory, two people arguing, a man flirting with a
woman, and so on.
In
"The Waiter Who Put a Check on the Table Face Up," an entire
restaurant population, waiters and customers, looks aghast at the offending
party— as does every member of the audience at a piano recital when a woman
snaps her purse "during a pianissimo" (every member of the audience
depicted in individual eccentricity in an expansive two-page cartoon).
Williams
sought to reveal the humor in ordinary life among ordinary people doing
everyday things. In many of his earliest endeavors, he said he was inspired by
the French cartoonist Caran d'Ache. In these, Williams filled a full
page (or two) with a sequence of drawings depicting in pantomine an
individual's growing frustration at performing some activity— a man struggling
to remove a stubborn dandelion from his lawn, a father trying to read aloud to
his son who fidgets in his lap and climbs all over him.
“I
was devoted to d’Ache,” Williams said to Marschall. “I liked his things
enormously; although our styles of drawing were entirely different, his way of
approaching things appealed to me.”
Later,
Williams reflected the influence of British cartoonist H.M. Bateman when
he depicted the fate or faux pax of "The Man Who ... "
Both
models are evident in "The Woman Who Suspects All Restaurant
Glasses," a succession of pictures showing an imposing matron arriving at
a restaurant table and then intently examining her water glass while a
gathering crowd of observing waiters displays, first, increasing concern, then
obvious relief when the glass passes inspection.
Sorel
believed that “the pen-and-ink technique Williams used to record his observations
owed much to the work of Aubrey Beardsley. At first it is difficult to
see what Beardsley’s erotic, serpentine illustrations have in common with
Williams’s open, sunny drawings, but the use of solid black shapes in an
otherwise delicate line drawing is common to both. In fact, Williams was so in
awe of Beardsley’s work that he never used white paint to correct a line,
because he believed (erroneously) that Beardsley never ‘whited out’ mistakes.”
“It
was some of a shock, therefore,” noted McCord, “when a young American artist
(Matlack Price) discovered some Beardsleys ‘fairly plastered with Chinese
white.’”
Oddly
perhaps, Williams favorite comic strip cartoonists were E.C. Segar and Frank
Willard, neither exactly in his manner in either drawing style or subject.
Both Popeye and Moon Mullins were determinedly slapstick
betraying no restraint whatsoever, and Williams’ humor is nothing if not
restrained.
Williams
soon honed his influences into his own brand of pawky humor, low-keyed and
restrained, and evolved a distinctive graphic style that was the perfect
complement to the comedy. His drawings, models of lucid simplicity, were
precisely outlined with a sturdy, unvarying line and then starkly accented with
solid, flat blacks. In both attitude and visual treatment, Williams's cartoons
were so wholly unpretentious that they seemed the embodiment of only honest
reportage on the human condition.
Famed
British cartoonist, and one-time editor of Punch, Kenneth Bird (aka Fougasse)
said: “It will be readily agreed that Gluyas is in a class by himself; but to
put this down to his drawing, or to his technique, or to the style he adopted
would be to do him very much less than justice.”
Sorel
agreed, advising that “if you want a quick fix on what upper-middle-class Americans
were doing between the two World Wars, look at the cartoons of Gluyas Williams.
It will take less time than reading Dodsworth or the works of J. P. Marquand,
and will be just as accurate. Accurate observation was the essence of
Williams’s art, and he was, in the words of one magazine editor, a ‘superb
noticer.’”
Williams
died in Boston in 1982 at the age of 93. Said Sorel: “The thousands of drawings
he left behind remain a superb guide to manners and customs during three
decades of the American saga. They are also, to a large extent, his
autobiography.”
A
few more fragments of his autobiography are posted forthwith.
Bibliography (for the compulsives among us)
Most of the information about Gluyas Williams's life and career can be found in Current Biography (1946) and in a 1975 interview with Richard Marschall
published in Nemo: The Classic Comics Library No.3 (October 1983). Among
the books he illustrated are Father of the Bride by Edward Streeter
(1948); There's a Fly in This Room (1946) and Wrap It as a Gift (1947) by Ralf Kircher; How to Guess Your Age (1950) by Corey Ford; The
Camp at Lockjaw (1952)by David McCord; and the following by Robert
Benchley: Of All Things (1922), Love Conquers All (1923), Pluck
and Luck (1924), The Early Worm (1927), The Treasurer's Report
and Other Aspects of Community Singing (1930), From Bad to Worse (1934), My TenYears in a Quandry (1936), After 1903—What? (1938), Inside Benchley (1942), Benchley Beside Himself (1943), Benchley—Or
Else (1947), and Chips off the Old Benchley (1949). Williams
cartoons are collected in two volumes, The Gluyas Williams Book (1929)
and Fellow Citizens (1940), both accompanied by appreciative and
informative introductions as is The Gluyas Williams Gallery (1957),
which includes sample text and illustrations from several of the books on which
the cartoonist collaborated plus a few cartoons. As far as I know, none of his
syndicated cartoons have been collected or reprinted (except those you find in
this essay—a spectacular exclusive).
Return to Harv's Hindsights |