|  | Opus Seven:
 
 
          1.  Yada 
            Yada Yada: The Tina Brown Travesty (8/25)  2.  Con-tributions: 
            Strolling the Aisles in San Diego (8/25)  
            
         1. Yada 
          Yada Yada.The first issue of Tina Brown's new magazine,Talk, came out in early August.  Thanks to an exclusive interview
 with Hillary Clinton in which the First Lady explained (1) her
 husband by saying he'd been caught in a psychologically abusive
 relationship between his mother and grandmother and (2) the
 continuation of her marriage by saying that she and Bill love each
 other--thanks chiefly to this sort of gossipy fare, the first issue
 was a newsstand success.
 Other features in the inaugural issue's 
          grab-bag: photo pieces on
 what to wear to a prize fight and on Gwyneth Paltrow and others
 dressing up to "play" different fantasy roles, Richard Butler's
 rehash of the failure of the UN's inspection team to outmaneuver
 Saddam Hussein, a blow-by-blow account by the guide who survived of
 the murder last March of tourists in the Uganda jungle, and a
 thoroughly unsensational recounting of how a infinitely minor poetess
 named Laura Riding destroyed the marriage of her hostess while a
 house guest in the summer of 1939.  JFK Jr. and George W. also
 received the obligatory attention.
 It was, in short, People magazine on slightly 
          larger pages.
 Oh--and, a Tina Brown trade-mark, dozens 
          of glossy full-page ads,
 photos bleeding to four sides, that begin the magazine.  Touting
 mostly products that hope to find women purchasers, the ads display
 luxuriously clad beautiful people, male occasionally but mostly
 female, pouting in arrogant disdain as they effectively postpone our
 encounter with editorial content for page after boring page.
 Forty-eight of them, to be exact, before we reach the first page of
 the magazine's first article.  And since these advertisers had 
          to
 contract for repeat performances over several more issues in order to
 get any space in the first issue, we may expect this sort of thing to
 go on interminably.
 The only reason I pause here over the 
          latest Tina Brown enterprise
 is that when she was editor of The New Yorker she talked
 affectionately about cartoons.  That was to introduce the magazine's
 annual "cartoon issue," admittedly --and so must be viewed as
 promotional puffery rather than editorial conviction --but still, I
 had hopes.  Tina dashed them: not a single cartoon anywhere in 
          her
 new magazine.
 I doubt we need another People magazine. 
           Particularly one without
 cartoons.
 
 return 
          to top of page 
         
 2. Con-tributions. One of the tantalizing provocations 
          about a
 comicon is that you find things that you weren't looking for.  In
 short, treasures.  At the San Diego Con, for instance, I found 
          a copy
 of a 1952 comic book I didn't know existed. Drawn by Jack Sparling,
 it's entitled Pin-Up Pete.  And the wonderful thing about it is 
          the
 absolutely unabashed candor of the title. Right: it's a book of
 pin-ups, fifties style.  Which is to say, not very daring: 
          just leggy
 ladies, one to a page. Also on each page, a small drawing of Pete
 ("Casanova of the Marine Corps") and a huge speech balloon in which
 Pete tells us about the pin-up on that page--Pauline the Painter (who
 got "mixed up" and left the ladies dressing room by a second exit
 instead of the one Pete was waiting at), Cassie the Car Hop (who
 responds to Pete's advances by hitting him in the face with the piece
 of pie he ordered) and so on.  We find out pretty quickly that 
          Pete,
 far from being God's gift to women as he fancies himself, is actually
 a pretty dumb cluck.  No other story.  None.  Not a single 
          narrative
 fragment on any page throughout the book.  The whole enterprise 
          is an
 excuse for Sparling to draw pin-ups.  The industry clearly couldn't
 take all that honesty: after No. 1 of this comic, there are no other
 numbers.
 While I spend a good deal of time pawing 
          through bins of Golden Age
 comics at a comicon, I also saunter around the Small Press area, and
 I pause in the aisles anytime I see a picture that's appealing.
 One of the latter is the cover of a new 
          comic book in
 black-and-white by Mike Kunkel--Herobear and the Kid.  Tyler is 
          the
 kid, and his relationship to a stuffed toy bear promises an
 interesting variation on Watterson's Calvin and Hobbes: Tyler's bear,
 however, becomes a giant superheroic bear wrapped in a crimson cape.
 No. 1 of the title ends when we meet Herobear; the rest of the book
 concerns Tyler's adventures at school, where, being small for his ten
 years, he is systematically bullied by the bigger boys.  But the
 thing that stopped me in the aisle was the artwork.The kid is all
 by himself on a snow-swept landscape on the cover, towing his toy
 bear by the hand and beaming from ear to ear.  Cute kid.Inside, 
          we
 encounter the book's most engaging visual novelty: Kunkel doesn't ink
 his pencil drawings; he leaves them in pencil, adds conte crayon
 shading, and gets the artwork shot as a drop-out halftone (which
 leaves all white areas white, not grayed with tiny dots).  We can 
          see
 the circles that underlie the heads of the characters, the center
 lines that establish nose and eye positions.  Makes every drawing
 appear softer, rounder.Kunkel's experience in animation shines
 through every page--not only in the style of the renderings but in
 the pacing and action sequences.  In short, a treasure.  A 
          treat.
 (No mailing address other than electronic: astonishco@aol.com)
 Black and white comics have always appealed 
          to me.  Some
 subconscious hold-over, doubtless, from my youth, which was spent
 enthralled by the daily newspaper comic strip.  And Anson Jew's
 Saturday Nite comic book (Nos. 1 and 2) provides a stunning example
 of how to do black-and-white.  Jew's line is clean and clear,
 unvarying in width but expertly placed in every composition.  He
 spots solid blacks with assurance and deftly applies gray zip-a-tone
 for atmosphere and "color."  Each issue includes one or two long
 stories and several one-to-three-page strips.  Jew sustains his
 narrative frequently with pictures alone, and one story is a minor
 key terror tale with no words at all.  Two of the longer stories 
          are
 slice-of-slacker-life exercises, and while I don't often enjoy these
 going-nowhere tales, Jew keeps the stories interesting with the
 restrained pace of his taut visuals.  (They go for $2.95 each; 
          P.O.
 Box 1625, Novato, CA 94947-1625.)
 What is there about slackers anyhow?  Now 
          that we have an alternate
 term for it, intellectual and occupational vagrancy is suddenly
 fashionable.  Everyone wants to join the bum club, which, I assume,
 will go slouching toward Bethlehem in cheerless out-of-cadence ennui
 forever and ever.
 Well?  What can you expect in a society 
          that makes popular icons out
 of J.R. Ewing, Darth Vader, and other serial criminals?  Beats 
          me.
 Meanwhile, the Love brothers are doing 
          a little pummeling of their
 own.  Operating as Gettosake Comics (9141 E. Stockton Blvd., Suite
 250-301, Elk Grove, CA 95624), Jeremy, Robert, and Maurice Love have
 produced a comic book and a magazine in launching a new line of
 titles by and about African Americans.  The full-color comic book,
 Chocolate Thunder ($2.95), features the title character as a highly
 trained costumed vigilante who takes on the drug racketeers that
 infest Brick City (pencilled by Jeremy and inked by Robert).  He
 re-appears in the black-and-white magazine, Urban Epic ($4.95), which
 also offers a humor strip about teenage life in the streets ("Say
 What?!" by Maurice) and a saga about slaves and freedom ("Shabazz" by
 Jeremy and Robert again).  The magazine also includes a gangsta 
          movie
 review column by Clyde.  The characters' dialogue rings inner-city
 true throughout these productions, and the drawing style is crisp and
 clean, portraying heroic characters in unabashed African American
 imagery.  Unhappily, Gettosake Comics is not as well served by 
          its
 printer.  The grays of the Chocolate Thunder story in Urban Epic 
          are
 often muddy.  The color work in Chocolate Thunder, on the other 
          hand,
 is fine.  The latter is jammed with Chocolate Thunder's tangled
 biography and so is heavily verbal, but when Chocolate Thunder goes
 into action in Urban Epic, the tale picks up.  The artwork needs
 background details--solid colors or gray tints or computer-generated
 brick walls are too flat to convey a convincing sense of locale; but
 the stunning facial renderings are a breath of fresh air in comics
 and worth the trip.  Keep an eye out.
 
 return 
          to top of page 
          return to archive main page
  To find 
          out about Harv's books, click here. 
         |